| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: Jorma Morkkis wrote: Elite players: players who get info about upcoming changes 2-3 months before everyone else so they can adapt. you just had to read forums to know that...I know, its a bit more complicated ...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.16 11:06:00
|
2. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: The gap between the "elite" and "n00b" players is already huge enough (not to be confused with the gap between "casual" and "active", which is a different issue altogether), and would remain similarly huge even if EITHER all T2 B...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.16 10:50:00
|
3. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: And why exactly would CCP add back something they explicitly said they wanted to remove (the monopoly on T2 production) and did so equally explicitly by adding invention ? Currently profit you as T2 BPO owner get from your inv...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.15 14:22:00
|
4. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: true, but we dont live in a perfect world Then: - Remove invention - Give more T2 BPOs to current active T2 BPO owners - Allow them to "copy" job to other slots in same system (only one print per item is needed) ...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.15 10:39:00
|
5. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Doktor Malinowka wrote: sorry son, but you`re the one who dont know what it means... when every single player in the game can build what a T2 BPO owner can, you think thats Monopoly? Read the thread... Like I said before... Remove inventio...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.15 08:52:00
|
6. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Ever going to post a quote and link to back up your bizzarre claims? Have you actually read this thread?
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.15 08:26:00
|
7. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: No, I didn't. Then you should know that it's better for you as T2 BPO owner. Have you actually read this thread?
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.15 08:21:00
|
8. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
You used word "monopoly" without knowing what it means.
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.15 07:48:00
|
9. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Monopoly holders benefit from strengthened monopolies. Exactly. Monopoly is always good for everyone. Even RL has proved that: nothing can compete against Microsoft.
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.14 17:08:00
|
10. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Lara Dantreb wrote: Jorma Morkkis wrote: It's a bit weird that you don't see how good idea it is. Because you're better player you are allowed to control how other players play the game. Another false assumption in this thread : who is mi...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.13 06:58:00
|
11. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Where has anyone, besides you and Brewlar, suggested that? It's a bit weird that you don't see how good idea it is. Because you're better player you are allowed to control how other players play the game.
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.13 06:03:00
|
12. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
CorInaXeraL wrote: You know what? Let's do it. CCP! We need another T2 lottery to push for this change. Let's hand out, oh...200 random T2 BPOs for high-end T2 items and make it happen. While we're at it, how about one lucky person gets a Reve...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.12 17:57:00
|
13. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: Jorma Morkkis wrote: So why it's so bad to buff T2 BPOs? Something like you should be able to use all lines available in the system, but you only need that one BPO. It's basically the same as releasing 50-200 times more BPO...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.12 14:41:00
|
14. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: Leaving T2 BPOs alone and instead buffing invention would lead to decreased T2 prices (arguably a good thing), lowered moongoo values (which is also arguably good), but still no extra profit per inventor (possibly, a lower profit...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.11 12:55:00
|
15. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Was T20 a tank? Or was it fictional character created by someone?
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.08 13:57:00
|
16. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Removing something isn't a change. It's a change. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lottery
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.04 10:19:00
|
17. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: T20 What does WWII tank has to do with EVE? And no, lottery hasn't changed in last 5 years.
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.04 09:41:00
|
18. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: This has absolutely nothing to do with with beeing "gifted" and even you probably know that. Its not a donation if you hand something out that the oposite has paid for (in form of a lottery ticket for exmaple). Ho...
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.04 08:48:00
|
19. Max refining yield % in a wormhole POS - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Compress ore with Rorqual and then move it out in smaller ships. As a bonus you get a very good way to collapse a wormhole if you ever have to do that.
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.04 07:44:00
|
20. T-2 invention (why I will not go down that road) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: not funny yet :) It's very nice to make billions when inventors need to spend huge amounts of money to get BPOs and to research, isn't it?
- by Jorma Morkkis - at 2012.09.03 19:18:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |